Photo © Chris Linder (Wyoming RAVE)
- Web Locations
- iLCP Tweets @ILCP
- No public Twitter messages.

The 3 top values guiding the organization are conservation, integrity, and photographic excellence.
Any photographer hoping to become a member of the ILCP must demonstrate these values through work that has helped to safeguard the biodiversity of the planet and the integrity of natural ecosystems; adhered to moral and ethical principles especially in behavior towards and depiction of the natural world, and set standards of photographic excellence for others to follow.
As Fellows and Associates of the iLCP, we commit ourselves to maintaining the highest ethical standards in both our business practices and our behavior in the field. We pledge to advance ethical behavior throughout the photographic community by setting an example of integrity and professionalism.
In doing so, we have adopted the following set of principles:
Guided by these principles, we adopt the following policies:
ILCP Fellows pledge to minimize our impact on the areas and subjects we photograph.
In some cases, photographing captive animals can be a valuable source of rare imagery that can be valuable for specific conservation goals. However, the use of captive animals must be governed by the same ethical considerations as elsewhere:
The documentary power of a photograph is directly linked to its value as a record of real events. Yet, with the advent of digital technology, the manipulation of images has become both easier and more widespread and can undermine public confidence in photography as a factual record.
For this reason, we believe that image manipulation must never alter essential content in such a way that it either misrepresents actual events, or deceives the intended audience, in any context in which the truth of the image is assumed. Creative manipulation, when performed, must be fully disclosed to the end user.
Photographs deliver information, which should be both accurate and honest. Inaccurate or dishonest captioning reduces the effectiveness of the image as a tool for conservation, subverts its message and undermines public trust.
